The fallout of naming Bitcoin’s creator

Peter Todd's safety at risk after HBO documentary.

Author

Daniel Akpobare
October 24, 2024

GM Explorer,

What happens when a playful quip turns deadly serious?

Discover how HBO's documentary naming Peter Todd as Bitcoin’s creator, coupled with his playful remarks about actually being Bitcoin’s creator, spiraled into a safety crisis.

Here’s what we got for you today:

  • 😱 The Fallout of Naming Bitcoin’s Creator!

  • 😤 Vitalik Buterin vs. Michael Saylor on Bitcoin Custody!

  • 🧱 Around The Block: Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse says XRP ETF is inevitable.

😱 The Fallout of Naming Bitcoin’s Creator!

Peter Todd has reportedly gone into hiding after being unmasked as ‘Satoshi Nakamoto’ in the HBO documentary “Money Electric: The Bitcoin Mystery.”

The documentary, released on October 9, explored various Nakamoto candidates and ended with Todd’s tongue-in-cheek admission, “Well yeah, I’m Satoshi Nakamoto.”

Despite Todd’s humorous intent, the claim sparked serious backlash, leading him to fear for his safety.

Todd strongly denies being Nakamoto, accusing the film’s director, Cullen Hoback, of using misleading material to reach this incorrect conclusion.

He insists that he only agreed to participate in the documentary because he believed it would chronicle Bitcoin’s history, not to be targeted as a suspect.

And now, Todd fears that being wrongly associated with Bitcoin's creator could make him a target for threats such as robbery or kidnapping—Nakamoto’s wealth is no joke.

But Hoback disagrees.

He argues that Todd and others have exaggerated the risks of identifying Nakamoto, claiming that the potential threats from such revelations have not materialized.

In fact, he believes that his investigation was crucial for industry transparency.

According to him, knowing who controls a significant portion of Bitcoin is vital for the cryptocurrency community.

However, one can argue that anonymity is also crucial in the crypto world, especially when billions of dollars in cryptocurrency are at stake.

Just imagine all the criminals who could try to loot your house or, worse, harm you in search of a wallet containing 1.1 million bitcoins worth $73 billion USD. Scary stuff!

So, the question is, is it right for filmmakers’ and the media to address such sensitive topics?

😤 Vitalik Buterin vs. Michael Saylor on Bitcoin Custody!

In the latest showdown of crypto titans, Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin threw some serious shade at MicroStrategy’s executive chairman, Michael Saylor, over his eyebrow-raising comments on Bitcoin custody.

Here’s how it all went down:

Saylor stirred the pot during a recent interview by suggesting Bitcoin holders trust "too big to fail" banks with their precious BTC instead of managing on their own.

And when the risks of government seizures came up, Saylor dismissed these concerns as the rants of “paranoid crypto-anarchists.”

But Buterin wasn’t about to let that slide.

He fired back, criticizing Saylor's take as dangerously too close to regulatory capture, where finance giants like BlackRock and Fidelity hold too much sway over lawmakers.

And just to drive the point home, Buterin called Saylor’s comments “batshit insane.”

Adding to the debate, Casa HODL’s Chief Security Officer, Jameson Lopp, chimed in with a thorough critique of institutional custody.

For him, centralizing Bitcoin not only increases the risk of loss and seizure but also strips its holders of their power, essentially turning them into the disenchanted “peasants” of the crypto kingdom.

Lopp also clarified that “Self-custody is not just a personal choice; it’s vital for the strength of the entire network.”

Amid all this drama, Saylor took to ‘X’ with a rather poetic post.

He shared a picture of himself holding a red rose, captioned: “Spread Bitcoin with love.” Whatever that means.

So, why should we care about any of this?

This debate has reignited a whole new discussion about Bitcoin custody (like we needed another one).

Plus, heated debates like this bring heightened tensions, sharp opinions, a little shade, and, of course, plenty of drama.

But could this influence regulations, affect the market, or even shake the very foundation of crypto?

Maybe we’re just overreacting. Let's hope it’s the latter!

Either way, this custody clash is no doubt far from over, so grab some popcorn and settle in—it’s going to be quite the spectacle!

For a deeper dive, you can read the full report here!

🧱 Around The Block

That's all we've got for you today.

What did you think of today's edition?

Login or Subscribe to participate in polls.

Did we miss anything? Or just want to say hey? We'd love to hear from you! You can

And If you haven't already, make sure to sign up to receive the next issue in your inbox.

Catch you soon.

DISCLAIMER: None of this is financial advice. This newsletter is strictly educational and is not investment advice or a solicitation to buy or sell assets or make financial decisions.

Reply

or to participate.